New, What to know before buying an aveo lt?

I know nothing about these cars and have been asked to go look at one for my sister to see if she should buy it. So being active on other car fourms I figured the best way to get the information I need is to ask the people who know these cars inside and out.

So what are the common problems on these cars that almost always need to be addressed when buying one?
Where should I be looking for signs and symptoms?
Whats the standard tune up on one of these with 120k miles on it I figured automaticlly the basics of all cars all fluids changed, new plugs and wires, brakes, the whole works.

Your knowlage is much appreciated and sorry If I posted this in the wrong area lol

I assume it is a 1st gen aveo for that kind of miles, not a bad car overall, but the big thing to check is the timing belt, at 120k or so it may very well need one if it has not been changed in the last 40-60k miles, if I was in your position, I would look at some other options, but if you can get the aveo at a good price/well maintained then you can't go wrong.

check all the suspension bushings etc, just like any other car with that kind of mileage. Control arm bushings and rear beam bushings are prone to ail on aveos at some point.

and timing belt.

Timing belt is a big one. There tends to be a nasty wind noise at speeds 65MPH range or on really windy days. It can be fixed and there is a how to on this forum. Not a big issue but can be annoying.

the timing belt was replaced along with the water pump at 80k miles everything else checked out good it was a company car so maintained pretty well I'm doing the valve cover gasket and plugs today. another question would be the fuel door... it needs a new latch or what ever you would like to call it anyone got a part number on that?

I own a 2010 Aveo, it's a 1.4l base-model manual. You should consider how poorly they perform in safety crash-tests before you buy them. youtube has several videos. Watch and think carefully before buying!

i disagree, "real world" crash my friend was in:



http://tapatalk.com/mu/a6f847f2-a49c-5f52.jpg


http://tapatalk.com/mu/a6f847f2-a4b2-01c9.jpg


Aveo - 1. 400whp mk2 - 0.

oh, btw, my friend was in the vw. not the aveo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPD

I own a 2010 Aveo.... You should consider how poorly they perform in safety crash-tests before you buy them.

---

Relative to what vehicles and which crash-tests??? The Aveo and others in its class do have weaknesses in side impact, with performance varying between sedan and hatchback body types. Aveo HB has been 5-star on frontal impact for both front seats since 2004. NHTSA test results for the U.S. Aveo variations thru 2010 are here:
1990-2010 Vehicle Search Results | Safercar -- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

Here is Aveo performance relative to some other 2010 like-class models:
1990-2010 Vehicle Search Results | Safercar -- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)

Sure, there are safer vehicles, especially many larger ones. Run a Suburban-class SUV and any subcompact into each other and the results are going to be lopsided... mass matters. Though when you stop to consider the NHTSA results, most car occupants would be slightly safer in a 2010 Aveo HB than a Mini Cooper, new Beetle, or Yaris.

Hi, thanks for posting those links, I feel much better about owning an Aveo now!
It sounded like the guy was buying an older Aveo with 120k on the clock (maybe not) and I accept that the model has been tested by many different organisations with differing results. It failed the Euro NCAP crash-test in 2006 as the passenger cell collapsed, but other tests may not have produced the same results.
I was comparing the Aveo with other similarly priced sedans like the Honda City and Yaris Sedan but whether they are safer would depend on how which test was used and how the Aveo LT was equipped (which year).
I agree the 2010 Aveo got the top rating in the US NACP as they improved the crumple zone and made airbags standard, but I inferred from the original post that someone couldn't have driven 120k since last year. Sounded like an older model.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPD

... I accept that the model has been tested by many different organisations with differing results. It failed the Euro NCAP crash-test in 2006 as the passenger cell collapsed, but other tests may not have produced the same results. ..... I agree the 2010 Aveo got the top rating in the US NACP as they improved the crumple zone and made airbags standard, but I inferred from the original post that someone couldn't have driven 120k since last year. Sounded like an older model.

---

Yes, '04 and '05 carry warnings of pelvic injury from the US side impact tests. But the substantial differences between US/Euro frontal tests for '06 are surprising. The Euro NCAP use a different (deformable) barrier and higher speeds than the US tests. Their 64 KPH (~40 MPH) would be roughly 14% faster than the US frontal impact speed. The dominant deficiency in the 2006 Aveo Euro NCAP results was that the driver dummy's chest hit and deformed the steering wheel. I suppose the speed difference could account for why this didn't show up in the US tests, but then I would question any results where a smiley face airbag deploys (see video at above link):D.

The 2010 Aveo also got top rating in the Euro NACP. In fact, it is the current (10/2011) leader among their most recent tests of cars in its "Supermini" class. See http://www.euroncap.com/supermini.aspx.

Forgot to add: if safety is your driving concern, then you probably shouldn't be looking in the Aveo/Supermini class in the first place:

No attempt is made to compare the performance of cars from different size categories. In frontal impacts between heavy and light cars, it is clear that momentum effects favour the occupants of the heavy car. Other characteristics also tend to favour larger cars. - Development of the Euro NCAP Programme

14% faster speed difference when there is 40 mph? most of that speed (the extra 5mph?) would be absorbed from the collapsable (deformable) barrier.


crashes never really happen like testing anyhow. never. human judgement and error are involved, as well as compensation.
like the front impact test you posted. you will never hit 3/4 front end head on, you react and turn your wheels one way or the other in an attempt to miss the impact. That will either spin you into more damage, or result in missing the impact completely.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by petrified.rabbit

14% faster speed difference when there is 40 mph? most of that speed (the extra 5mph?) would be absorbed from the collapsable (deformable) barrier.

crashes never really happen like testing anyhow. never. human judgement and error are involved, as well as compensation.

---

You're right, both attempt to model collisions between similar sized cars with US at 35 MPH and Euro at ~34 MPH. However, something still has to account for the gross difference in results for 2006. Just focused on the secondary impact with the steering wheel which earned the slash on the Euro test, either the restraint system failed to perform or there was greater movement in the steering column (or both).... [assuming someone didn't bungle the test/model]. While the way the barrier deformed could have affected the second, the difference in speed could have affected either. The distribution of serious injury/fatal accidents around 35 MPH impact speed is surprizingly tight, so 5 MPH makes a huge difference in outcome.... and the dummy was still brought to a halt from ~40 MPH. It probably didn't see the full force of the additional 5 MPH for the reasons you gave, but it saw some of it... enough to account for the less favorable results, anyway.

Agree other factors, like the mind behind the wheel, are much more significant to safety, but didn't want to diverge. This is why I have little anxiety over the "pelvic injury" risk in our 2004 HB. Still, I respect that the difference in risk between the 2004 and 2010 model years is real and would consider it if in the market. But then I've been "the barrier" in the majority of my accidents; there's little opportunity for compensation when you're not moving. For those situations, the NCAP tests are a good relative comparison for safety assuming the striking vehicle is of a similar size.... and that is a BIG assumption, especially in the land of full-size pickups.