•  
    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
    Results 21 to 30 of 31

    Thread: downshift vs neutral

    1. #21
      I'll keep it and add a turbo mralx152's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2013
      Location
      Atlanta ga
      Posts
      148
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      I guess I need to do some research. Thanks bud. Whats ur car?



    2. #22
      I'll keep it and add a turbo mralx152's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2013
      Location
      Atlanta ga
      Posts
      148
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Just noticed this is my 100th post all in the same month less than 14 days. Lol

    3. #23
      Still love my daily driver Pickles's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2012
      Location
      United States
      Posts
      953
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    4. #24
      I'll keep it and add a turbo mralx152's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2013
      Location
      Atlanta ga
      Posts
      148
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Nice. Love the headlights.

    5. #25
      Still love my daily driver Pickles's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2012
      Location
      United States
      Posts
      953
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Thanks. Built those myself

    6. #26
      I'll keep it and add a turbo mralx152's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2013
      Location
      Atlanta ga
      Posts
      148
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Nice. What was ur 1/4 and 1/2 mile times?

    7. #27
      I'll keep it and add a turbo Pontiac1976's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2009
      Location
      Around Ottawa area - Ontario,Canada
      Posts
      193
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
      I would not down shift unless you need extra faster stops, because brakes are cheaper easier to replace then a clutch. neutral obviously slows you down less and you'll go farther. But the rpm drops to 1000RPM coast at idle speed. If you’re going to work, time the lights using gas & neutral still save the brakes.
      Last edited by Pontiac1976; 09-16-2013 at 05:10 AM.
      PONTIAC1976


      PONTIAC
      The Mark of a Great Car
      PONTIAC
      The Mark of a Great Car



      This new set up is Messed up! at CarDomain. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3101276

    8. #28
      I'll keep it and add a turbo mralx152's Avatar
      Join Date
      Sep 2013
      Location
      Atlanta ga
      Posts
      148
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by Pontiac1976 View Post
      I would not down shift unless you need extra faster stops, because brakes are cheaper easier to replace then a clutch. neutral obviously slows you down less and you'll go farther. But the rpm drops to 1000RPM coast at idle speed. If you’re going to work, time the lights using gas & neutral still save the brakes.
      I can agree with most of that but ive never had to get a new cluch and I ride my cars hard. But than again I do use stage 2 clutchs

    9. #29
      What's wrong with my car?
      Join Date
      Feb 2014
      Location
      Renton, WA
      Posts
      10
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      First thing they learn you in car schools in Europe is always use downshifting.... it eases and slows the car smoothly. 15 years ago most cars didnt have ABS so a sudden hit on the brakes could make you slide.

      Times have changed, and technology has improved and when it comes to fuel economy and overall economy i would agree that brake discs are cheaper than clutches.

    10. #30
      What's wrong with my car?
      Join Date
      Nov 2014
      Location
      Massachusetts
      Posts
      14
      Garage empty: add car
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      In my experience, it doesn't make a huge difference what you do (downshifting, nuetral, staying in gear until you're almost stopped) MPG wise. It's very subtle so long as you drive well. I always anticipate my stops early and start to let the car slow itself, then I downshift with rev matching to not wear the clutch. Then once I have to use the brakes, I heel-toe downshift (again to not wear the clutch excessively) to come to a stop. I will only downshift to 3rd or 2nd depending on the conditions. If I can easily stop, 3rd - if I'm facing downhill or just need to stop quick for some reason I get into 2nd. The engine will naturally want to drop its speed, helping you in slowing down. I don't always do this, sometimes I can anticipate a stop and just gently brake in gear. My mileage never changed much. I did tests driving my same routes using only neutral and braking, downshifting and braking, leaving it in gear and braking, and heel-toe downshifting. The mileage was basically the same for all of them, only varying maybe 1 or 2 MPGS at the most. So, I'd say do what you like doing. I personally just feel more in control downshifting, because it really helps slowing you down. But some people think it's extra work.





    Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Replies: 1
      Last Post: 08-13-2012, 05:51 AM
    2. Coasting in Neutral, Automatic Transmission
      By Red1 in forum Fuel Economy
      Replies: 31
      Last Post: 07-27-2011, 06:07 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •