•  
    Results 1 to 10 of 10

    Thread: intake and muffler worth the mpgs??

    Hybrid View

    Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
    1. #1
      Administrator Daox's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jan 2007
      Location
      Wisconsin
      Posts
      2,523
      Thanks
      172
      Thanked 92 Times in 80 Posts
      When you're just cruising (low engine load) there really is no restriction since you are using such a small percentage of the power the engine is capable of providing. During acceleration (high engine load) is actually where your engine is being used most efficiently. Google brake specific fuel consumption for more info.

      Bottom line is, intake and exhaust will do absolutely nothing to improve your mileage. It'll actually probably hurt it.

    2. #2
      What do you mean there's no turbo? northguest47's Avatar
      Join Date
      Feb 2011
      Location
      Brampton, ON, Canada
      Posts
      448
      Thanks
      16
      Thanked 35 Times in 32 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by Daox View Post
      Bottom line is, intake and exhaust will do absolutely nothing to improve your mileage. It'll actually probably hurt it.
      Thanks for the BSFC info Daox, and, I respectfully disagree with the above statement. If one makes the airflow into and out of the motor more laminar then the motor would be more efficient making more horsepower at the same rpm, wouldn't this mean the car would accelerate to target speed using less fuel if it were compared to the same acceleration curve with a stock car? The cruising part makes sense for sure but what about during acceleration, and city driving having a lot of it?

      Right off wikepedias entry on BSFC, "a reciprocating engine achieves maximum efficiency when the intake air is un-throttled", and it is proportional to fuel consumption rate, r

      A corollary statement could be if you made the intake and exhaust smaller, say 1" or 1/2" are you saying that this won't affect mileage whatsoever? Thats really what I am interested in, because was thinking that some of the horsepower of the motor has to be used just to overcome friction losses in the system, so then it wouldn't be going to the axle, and it seems there is an efficiency loss there.


    Similar Threads

    1. 94 Octane, is it worth the 10 cents per/L more?
      By mystere485 in forum Engine & Drivetrain
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: 09-22-2013, 04:19 AM
    2. Replies: 13
      Last Post: 05-28-2011, 09:42 PM
    3. aveoclub net worth
      By mikedudley17 in forum General Discussion
      Replies: 23
      Last Post: 08-19-2010, 09:14 PM
    4. Is it worth lowering?
      By lowaveo17 in forum Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
      Replies: 32
      Last Post: 09-25-2008, 11:28 PM
    5. UPDATED PICTURES LOOK!!! ITS WORTH IT!!!
      By onephastmike in forum Photographs and Videos
      Replies: 6
      Last Post: 08-30-2008, 08:03 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •