Originally Posted by
= Plutoman
....
Now, a fact to point out - the thickness does not determine the dampening properties of the deadener. The material composition and how well it reflects the sound is what makes the difference. You are unable to absorb the sound waves with any decent amount of deadener, you would need layers multiple feet thick to absorb the sound waves. Instead, you have to deflect them, and different materials do that better than others.
The difference between products such as Raamat, and fatmat, and SS, is not the thickness. It's the material type, the composition, as to how well they will work. SS is more expensive, but it does the job a lot better. If you don't care about a really nice job, but want a decent deadening job, just enough to help some, then the others are cheaper. If you want nice results, and the same results from all products, the SS will be cheaper to attain those results. That goes for the materials on sds, also.
If you don't care about having a great job done, and really want to constrict the budget, go with the cheaper stuff. If you want that nice job, instead of trying to make the cheaper stuff work, you'll need to bump the budget up and get better materials. And the amount of layers won't matter. Shouldn't need any more than two, really, just even one. It's for the deflection of sound, not the absorption, and the thickness does not matter nearly as much for that.